Head to Head ・ 力士比較
Rikishi Comparison
VS
Kotoyama
ELO1,727
Head to Head
3−2
5 bouts
Tamaasuka
ELO2,221
Win Probability (ELO-based)
6%
94%
KotoyamaELO差 -494Tamaasuka
Verdict
Tamaasuka slight edge
ELO leans Tamaasuka (94%); style roughly even. H2H: Kotoyama leads 3-2.
Sumo Style & Matchup
Style mix computed from kimarite
Kotoyama
Pulling Pusher
VS
Tamaasuka
Belt Grinder
46%
Oshi44%
26%
Yotsu48%
22%
Nage6%
12%
Tech5%
Win rate by opponent type
59% 19-13
Fwd push
49-41 54%
69% 18-8
Pull
26-33 44%
72% 51-20
Yori
58-45 56%
36% 16-29
Throw
31-29 52%
25% 2-6
Tech
13-21 38%
›Style matchup Pulling Pusher vs Belt Grinder: roughly even (49%).
›Tamaasuka is only 44% (26-33) vs "Pulling Pusher" types like Kotoyama.
Career Stats — leading value in red
1,727
ELO
2,221
53.6%
Win Rate
50.4%
243
Career Wins
580
210
Career Losses
571
0
Yusho
0
Sandanme 90 West
Best Rank
Makushita 6 West
H2H by Year
99
00
01
■ Kotoyama■ Tamaasuka
Kimarite Breakdown
Hatakikomi32%
Yorikiri49%
Yorikiri27%
Oshidashi34%
Uwatenage16%
Yoritaoshi8%
Oshidashi13%
Oshitaoshi5%
Hikiotoshi12%
Tsukiotoshi4%
Recent Bouts
2001年九州場所Kotoyama winsTsukiotoshi
2000年秋場所Tamaasuka winsYoritaoshi
2000年初場所Tamaasuka winsYorikiri
1999年九州場所Kotoyama winsYoritaoshi
1999年秋場所Kotoyama winsHikiotoshi